Regrettably, it seems you have fundamentally misunderstood my entire piece.
"Some of my opinions may be accurate?" Nothing in this entire piece is opinion. Regardless of your care for the the facts, this piece is representative of immigration law, which I know personally, having helped a partner navigate the ICE system after applying for …
Regrettably, it seems you have fundamentally misunderstood my entire piece.
"Some of my opinions may be accurate?" Nothing in this entire piece is opinion. Regardless of your care for the the facts, this piece is representative of immigration law, which I know personally, having helped a partner navigate the ICE system after applying for asylum.
And since this piece is not opinion, but fact, it is of no matter whether Abrego Garcia spent time near, with, around, or above MS-13 members. That is not proof that a crime has been committed.
In immigration law, the burden of proof resides with the individual. Abrego Garcia was able to demonstrate his need to remain in the country. That is the relevant information, full stop.
Regrettably, it seems you have fundamentally misunderstood my entire piece.
"Some of my opinions may be accurate?" Nothing in this entire piece is opinion. Regardless of your care for the the facts, this piece is representative of immigration law, which I know personally, having helped a partner navigate the ICE system after applying for asylum.
And since this piece is not opinion, but fact, it is of no matter whether Abrego Garcia spent time near, with, around, or above MS-13 members. That is not proof that a crime has been committed.
In immigration law, the burden of proof resides with the individual. Abrego Garcia was able to demonstrate his need to remain in the country. That is the relevant information, full stop.