How any reasonable and moral American can not be decided against Harris-Walz is beyond me.
Had the Democrats not dictatorially iced out Biden's primary challengers (and then forced Biden to withdraw--in order to nominate Harris), there was a good chance that Kennedy would have been their nominee.…
How any reasonable and moral American can not be decided against Harris-Walz is beyond me.
Had the Democrats not dictatorially iced out Biden's primary challengers (and then forced Biden to withdraw--in order to nominate Harris), there was a good chance that Kennedy would have been their nominee.--and, today, I would've been that close to voting for himKennedy (instead of for Trump).
Mostly, I just want promptly--and accurately--reported election results, no nuclear war overseas, and--domestically--uninterrupted energy, food, and banking systems.
Within a week after Kennedy announced his Democrat candidacy, I was telling people around me, "If he's still in the race next spring, I will 'crossover' and vote for him (against Biden) in the Democrat primary." On some issues, Kennedy leaves me with misgivings, and, sometimes, he talks out of both sides of his mouth, but he didn't commit a "You people" blunder (as Ross Perot did in 1992), and he didn't pander to Muslim voters by criticuizing The Jewish State's military operations after October 7, 2023.
(Rarely do I lift a finger anymore for any political candidate; and yet, since last year, I bought Kennedy campaign t-shirts for my kids and for me.)
It won't surprise me if, in 2027, he declares another presidential candidacy.
When the DNC rigged its primaries to guarantee that no Biden opponent would have a chance of winning the nomination, I began to appreciate the outrage that Sanders supporters felt in 2016. (For decades, I've despised the Democrat Party; this year--as i did in 2020--I hated it.)
I genuinely do not know why you think the primary was rigged this year. Because there wasn't a debate? It makes it harder, I suppose, but I don't think that's rigging anything. You can still have a debate without the DNC.
Late last year, the DNC changed the primary election rules--to the effect that primary challengers who campaigned in a Democrat primary state would become ineligible to be awarded prez-nominating convention delegates from that state. (I don't know the fine points of the rigging, but that was an important reason that Kennedy cited for quitting the Democrats. (As long as the Clinton-Obama cabal could continue to prop up Biden, it did so--until it decided that Harris would suffice as Biden's replacement.)
Regardless of claims of DNC conspiracies against RFK, what on earth makes you think that left-wing Democratic primary voters would want him over Biden?
Nothing is entirely reliable. Point is, I’ve spent time trying to figure out what in the world you are talking about, and came up with nothing. Would love a link.
Well, you've had a long and varied journey.
How any reasonable and moral American can not be decided against Harris-Walz is beyond me.
Had the Democrats not dictatorially iced out Biden's primary challengers (and then forced Biden to withdraw--in order to nominate Harris), there was a good chance that Kennedy would have been their nominee.--and, today, I would've been that close to voting for himKennedy (instead of for Trump).
Mostly, I just want promptly--and accurately--reported election results, no nuclear war overseas, and--domestically--uninterrupted energy, food, and banking systems.
You believe that Democratic primary voters would have picked RFK Jr.?
He would have been a strong underdog.
Within a week after Kennedy announced his Democrat candidacy, I was telling people around me, "If he's still in the race next spring, I will 'crossover' and vote for him (against Biden) in the Democrat primary." On some issues, Kennedy leaves me with misgivings, and, sometimes, he talks out of both sides of his mouth, but he didn't commit a "You people" blunder (as Ross Perot did in 1992), and he didn't pander to Muslim voters by criticuizing The Jewish State's military operations after October 7, 2023.
(Rarely do I lift a finger anymore for any political candidate; and yet, since last year, I bought Kennedy campaign t-shirts for my kids and for me.)
It won't surprise me if, in 2027, he declares another presidential candidacy.
Kennedy could have run as a democrat, if he wanted to. I voted for Marianne Williamson in the primary. There was, in fact, a primary.
When the DNC rigged its primaries to guarantee that no Biden opponent would have a chance of winning the nomination, I began to appreciate the outrage that Sanders supporters felt in 2016. (For decades, I've despised the Democrat Party; this year--as i did in 2020--I hated it.)
I genuinely do not know why you think the primary was rigged this year. Because there wasn't a debate? It makes it harder, I suppose, but I don't think that's rigging anything. You can still have a debate without the DNC.
Late last year, the DNC changed the primary election rules--to the effect that primary challengers who campaigned in a Democrat primary state would become ineligible to be awarded prez-nominating convention delegates from that state. (I don't know the fine points of the rigging, but that was an important reason that Kennedy cited for quitting the Democrats. (As long as the Clinton-Obama cabal could continue to prop up Biden, it did so--until it decided that Harris would suffice as Biden's replacement.)
Regardless of claims of DNC conspiracies against RFK, what on earth makes you think that left-wing Democratic primary voters would want him over Biden?
With respect, I've spent about ten minutes Googling and I still cannot find any information that is similar to what you wrote.
Google is not entirely reliable.
Nothing is entirely reliable. Point is, I’ve spent time trying to figure out what in the world you are talking about, and came up with nothing. Would love a link.