For sure, I understand your perspective. Your version of Christianity would be very agreeable to me. But I'm making a counter-argument that your beliefs aren't really "true" Christianity if you reject the following: the divinity of Jesus, miracles, the resurrection, the Virgin Birth, Original Sin, biblical inerrancy, etc. If you reject t…
For sure, I understand your perspective. Your version of Christianity would be very agreeable to me. But I'm making a counter-argument that your beliefs aren't really "true" Christianity if you reject the following: the divinity of Jesus, miracles, the resurrection, the Virgin Birth, Original Sin, biblical inerrancy, etc. If you reject those dogmas, your position might be better described as "deism" and not "Christianity." Especially if you don't go to church, then it can't be called Christianity.
For sure, I understand your perspective. Your version of Christianity would be very agreeable to me. But I'm making a counter-argument that your beliefs aren't really "true" Christianity if you reject the following: the divinity of Jesus, miracles, the resurrection, the Virgin Birth, Original Sin, biblical inerrancy, etc. If you reject those dogmas, your position might be better described as "deism" and not "Christianity." Especially if you don't go to church, then it can't be called Christianity.
There is no “true Christianity.”