I've been working on a piece about the way those cohorts differ from each other in Finland but from a generational trauma perspective. Those born in the 1940s-1960s were raised by parents deeply affected by war and the postwar rebuilding. That left them with shared traits but also a wide gap to their parents. After reading your piece, I can't help but think the picture might have more to it. Maybe it's unresolved trauma and environmental damage like lead exposure together.
It seems like our observations confirm at least one thing; those raised by this cohort can assess and understand a bigger picture and hopefully steer themselves towards a better future.
But since trauma is by definition generational, we can't take ourselves out of the equation.
Your generational research sounds very interesting and I’m glad that this lead hypothesis that I’m developing might be useful for you. Could you please tell me more about your research? I’m curious to learn more.
Thanks. I will certainly share more. I think this is an interesting merge from my perspective. I’m still working on the piece. It’s a bit “long time coming”.
I worked in drug policy/criminal justice reform in the 90’s, and have long been convinced that the elimination of lead, from gasoline in particular was a significant factor in suddenly-falling crime rates. If you look at the data at an even more granular level, it seems that the timing of these precipitous declines in crime in place after place followed the timing of the removal of leaded gasoline. The broad scale emergence of “FOX brain syndrome” among seniors makes total sense when we understand that these stored toxins are inevitably being released back into bloodstreams from the bones.
Thanks so much for writing this. I hope it gains wide attention.
I really appreciate your encouraging words so much. I was afraid that nobody was really going to get this one so it's wonderful and affirming to see someone with expertise affirming that this could be significant.
Have any thoughts on where I should go next in my research? I'm planning a follow-up piece or two to present what I'm able to find in peer-reviewed papers on this.
I’m new here (been lurking for a couple of months), and I really like your writing. I hope to start writing here as well. My expertise on this only goes so deep. Years ago I was able to find a chart on where and when leaded gasoline was banned, and checked it against crime stats. It seemed like everywhere that did saw crime start dropping around 4 years thereafter. Obviously that doesn’t prove causality, but it was pretty stark.
Not sure what to recommend, but as a Jew who sees our mythology, important as it is, as just that, and seeing too the dangers inherent when people who subscribe to literalist beliefs rise to power, i’ve been thinking a lot about whether secular Jews ought to be standing up to call that out. Our mythology has created us as much as we created it, and we ought to honor it and the traditions that have allowed us to remain an identifiable and largely communal tribe for thousands of years, committed to literacy, education, and healing the world. But so much of the trouble the world faces is grounded in people living in unreality, and trying to bring their version of unreality into time. And since so much of western religion is grounded in Jewish mythology as a basis, do we have a special responsibility to call it what it is, and stop countenancing literal belief in our own community?
Wow. Thank you so much. I’m going to buy and read this book. There’s so much power and wisdom and resilience in our tribe, and yet fundamentalism, whatever its stripe, is always a danger when it is empowered. And that empowerment, it seems to be, is grounded first in an unwillingness of more rational minds to outwardly address the question or imagine the dangers posed by a portion of their tribe that accepts mythology as reality. But that’s a difficult and likely a very unpopular thing to do.
For the record (not that you asked), I don’t believe that this requires the rejection of the existence of a higher power, only the acceptance that the stories told by ancients to describe or make sense of that concept are just that. And again, it feels like our place, and our mythology’s place in both history and in the mythology of the other major (western) religions (whose various fundamentalisms are perhaps even more dangerous than our own) gives us a unique perspective and responsibility to address this within our community.
This is a very thought provoking topic, and deserves serious scientific study. A secondary item to consider is the rise of aluminum and lead from many different sources…could the rise in crime, homosexuality, transgenderism, and school shooters be attributed to a more aggressive vaccine schedule?
How about asbestos? As a small child (74 years now) I scraped asbestos covered pipes to watched the white powder fall on my face and hair. Now I have thyroid problems and osteoporosis. Any connections here?
That certainly can have negative effects, but I'm not sure that it would do the same thing as lead or that exposure to it would be as widespread/intense as leaded gasoline/paint.
This is a seriously fascinating hypothesis.
I've been working on a piece about the way those cohorts differ from each other in Finland but from a generational trauma perspective. Those born in the 1940s-1960s were raised by parents deeply affected by war and the postwar rebuilding. That left them with shared traits but also a wide gap to their parents. After reading your piece, I can't help but think the picture might have more to it. Maybe it's unresolved trauma and environmental damage like lead exposure together.
It seems like our observations confirm at least one thing; those raised by this cohort can assess and understand a bigger picture and hopefully steer themselves towards a better future.
But since trauma is by definition generational, we can't take ourselves out of the equation.
Your generational research sounds very interesting and I’m glad that this lead hypothesis that I’m developing might be useful for you. Could you please tell me more about your research? I’m curious to learn more.
Thanks. I will certainly share more. I think this is an interesting merge from my perspective. I’m still working on the piece. It’s a bit “long time coming”.
I'm looking forward to it. :)
Absolutely frightening hypothesis and worth pursuing! I think it’s in the food we consume.
I worked in drug policy/criminal justice reform in the 90’s, and have long been convinced that the elimination of lead, from gasoline in particular was a significant factor in suddenly-falling crime rates. If you look at the data at an even more granular level, it seems that the timing of these precipitous declines in crime in place after place followed the timing of the removal of leaded gasoline. The broad scale emergence of “FOX brain syndrome” among seniors makes total sense when we understand that these stored toxins are inevitably being released back into bloodstreams from the bones.
Thanks so much for writing this. I hope it gains wide attention.
I really appreciate your encouraging words so much. I was afraid that nobody was really going to get this one so it's wonderful and affirming to see someone with expertise affirming that this could be significant.
Have any thoughts on where I should go next in my research? I'm planning a follow-up piece or two to present what I'm able to find in peer-reviewed papers on this.
I’m new here (been lurking for a couple of months), and I really like your writing. I hope to start writing here as well. My expertise on this only goes so deep. Years ago I was able to find a chart on where and when leaded gasoline was banned, and checked it against crime stats. It seemed like everywhere that did saw crime start dropping around 4 years thereafter. Obviously that doesn’t prove causality, but it was pretty stark.
That's so kind of you to say. Are there any subjects you'd like me to write about more?
You should start writing here. It's wonderful. What are you thinking about writing on?
Not sure what to recommend, but as a Jew who sees our mythology, important as it is, as just that, and seeing too the dangers inherent when people who subscribe to literalist beliefs rise to power, i’ve been thinking a lot about whether secular Jews ought to be standing up to call that out. Our mythology has created us as much as we created it, and we ought to honor it and the traditions that have allowed us to remain an identifiable and largely communal tribe for thousands of years, committed to literacy, education, and healing the world. But so much of the trouble the world faces is grounded in people living in unreality, and trying to bring their version of unreality into time. And since so much of western religion is grounded in Jewish mythology as a basis, do we have a special responsibility to call it what it is, and stop countenancing literal belief in our own community?
I also understand why this may piss a lot of people off.
I have the perfect book for you that will answer your question... https://rushkoff.com/books/nothing-sacred/
Wow. Thank you so much. I’m going to buy and read this book. There’s so much power and wisdom and resilience in our tribe, and yet fundamentalism, whatever its stripe, is always a danger when it is empowered. And that empowerment, it seems to be, is grounded first in an unwillingness of more rational minds to outwardly address the question or imagine the dangers posed by a portion of their tribe that accepts mythology as reality. But that’s a difficult and likely a very unpopular thing to do.
For the record (not that you asked), I don’t believe that this requires the rejection of the existence of a higher power, only the acceptance that the stories told by ancients to describe or make sense of that concept are just that. And again, it feels like our place, and our mythology’s place in both history and in the mythology of the other major (western) religions (whose various fundamentalisms are perhaps even more dangerous than our own) gives us a unique perspective and responsibility to address this within our community.
Thanks again for the book recommendation.
This is a very thought provoking topic, and deserves serious scientific study. A secondary item to consider is the rise of aluminum and lead from many different sources…could the rise in crime, homosexuality, transgenderism, and school shooters be attributed to a more aggressive vaccine schedule?
No.
How about asbestos? As a small child (74 years now) I scraped asbestos covered pipes to watched the white powder fall on my face and hair. Now I have thyroid problems and osteoporosis. Any connections here?
That certainly can have negative effects, but I'm not sure that it would do the same thing as lead or that exposure to it would be as widespread/intense as leaded gasoline/paint.
Thank you 🙏🏼